As shown in section 2, Overall presentation with general conclusions, page 4 to 12, the entire ACP biofuel paper is based upon a strange and incoherent interpretation of reality and holds a large number of fallacies, each of which adds to its ultimate uselessness.
And as explained on page 13, in the first part of section 3, Separate objections with consequences and conclusions, the very structure of the ACP biofuel paper, its many implicit and/or non verified assumptions and non verifiable sources, and its high apparent credibility, necessitate a thorough disproof.
In contrast to the ACP biofuel paper, the entire contents of the Disproof is fully transparent and verifiable, with careful presentation of the basis, and backed by comprehensive calculations and references to verifiable sources, all accessible through live links.
The only way to present a complete disproof of the ACP biofuel paper is to publish one comprehensive paper where the entire contents is fully transparent and verifiable, with careful presentation of the basis, and backed by comprehensive calculations and references to verifiable sources, all accessible through live links.
And it is exactly the completeness of the Disproof that gives it the strength to convince and support those that are willing to accept the facts of the matter and to be irrefutable to those that are reluctant to.
A short version would inevitably be incomplete and lack verifiability, and papers on separate aspects would form fragments of the whole without their interrelations and mutual intensification.
If a short version and/or separate papers were published by the author, that/these would be read and referred to by most instead of the comprehensive paper.
In other words, anything separately published by the author less than the full Disproof would undermine it, in reality replacing it by something far weaker and more vulnerable to otherwise obviously unfounded attacks.
However, the Disproof does contain in itself both a short version and separate parts dealing with separate aspects, and it has been structured to facilitate reading at any level from the briefest survey to the most detailed exposition enabling contemplation and scrutiny:
- The half page Abstract forms a condensed statement of the facts of the matter;
- The 9 pages section 2, Overall presentation with general conclusions, forms a short version referring to the comprehensive section 3;
- The 83 pages section 3, Separate objections with consequences and conclusions, holds 7 separate parts each dealing with a separate aspect, structured in a way that enables reading of selected parts only as explained in the introductory part with instructions.
Hopefully, others capable of reaching far greater circles with far greater impact will be willing to use the Disproof as a sound basis for a final establishment of the facts of the matter, so no more time and effort is wasted on a fallacy, and so everyone may move on to what may and should be done; recommendations and suggestions concerning the latter are presented in the final section 4 of the Disproof.
